PE Rolling Road Figures 31st Oct 2009
- Thread starter edk
- Start date
errr 153bhp if i had gone lol
shaggy_master
brapp brapp!
Its not fair to say that David. My car could just be fucked lol
Joe
Joe
Not bad concidering im runnig a standard SR20 with Decat, Back box and an Apexi filter
wouldn't have been surprised if that is what he got, far as I know everyone got a lower figure than anticipated....which was very odd
shaggy_master
brapp brapp!
Maybe your right G... Everyone seemed 5bhp down maybe.. But I've lost potentiallly 30-35bhp somewhere.
Joe
Powerunn
BHP/WHP
Air Fuel Ratio
Now im going to add this to the mix.. my old 206.. a 1.4 8V with induction kit/decat/catback/remap
95bhp... on a DYNOMITE dyno
BHP/WHP
Air Fuel Ratio
Now im going to add this to the mix.. my old 206.. a 1.4 8V with induction kit/decat/catback/remap
95bhp... on a DYNOMITE dyno
144bhp great going pal, better than GA power lol
hey your redline beez like 7,500rpm WOW
hey your redline beez like 7,500rpm WOW
there were no VVL motas down there apart from my Prim...
.
First PE ran the car in SHOOT_4 mode as per everyone else. But after checking previous print outs I had with me which were all in SHOOT_4F (for forced induction) we did another few runs.
First thing to remember here is I'm working against the ECU's OEM map, so the boost won't ever go higher than stock thus fueling won't increase either. It's about the drive improvement for now and the mods here will help loads when it comes to remapping.
From these graphs I can see how the torque delivery after the VNT does it's thing (that little spike) is more sustained and continues rising past 3k. This is improved from before the IC upgrade and cold feed. So the mods I've done have made a small improvement in delivery but no really power or torque increaseds... which is understandable really as I said it's still got standard mapping.
The runs also showed the governer coming in at about 4.3k reducing fuel (or boost pressure via the VNT mech) and at the same time power drops off rapidly. Power is also consistant with AFR. This shows me how an improved map which increases fuel and boost pressure at 3.5k far higher than currently will give me an increased power curve right the way up to 4750k or even 5k.
I can't wait for this to be unleashed!!
BHP/TORQUE
BHP/WHP
AFR (print out from previous run in SHOOT_4 mode).
This is a good point. It seems Dyno Dynamics have made a good rolling resistance for petrol n/a in SHOOT_4 mode but really it seems a diesel needs something inbetween that and 4F. He also said how the gear selection. To bring up peak power within a certain speed. On the DCi 3rd fell just short and 4th just over so another grey area.
First thing to remember here is I'm working against the ECU's OEM map, so the boost won't ever go higher than stock thus fueling won't increase either. It's about the drive improvement for now and the mods here will help loads when it comes to remapping.
From these graphs I can see how the torque delivery after the VNT does it's thing (that little spike) is more sustained and continues rising past 3k. This is improved from before the IC upgrade and cold feed. So the mods I've done have made a small improvement in delivery but no really power or torque increaseds... which is understandable really as I said it's still got standard mapping.
The runs also showed the governer coming in at about 4.3k reducing fuel (or boost pressure via the VNT mech) and at the same time power drops off rapidly. Power is also consistant with AFR. This shows me how an improved map which increases fuel and boost pressure at 3.5k far higher than currently will give me an increased power curve right the way up to 4750k or even 5k.
I can't wait for this to be unleashed!!
BHP/TORQUE
BHP/WHP
AFR (print out from previous run in SHOOT_4 mode).
I promise I will try and get mine up.
Mine is interesting compared to Ed's as my car is completely standard so we can compare our cars a little.
(Looking at Eds of shoot 4 and shoot 4f) I think if I remember correctly the man said that it was hard to find a category to place diesels in as they are a bit of a grey area. What was shocking was the amount of categories there were rather than just a couple which I would have thought he brought the list up and the results vary from each one.
I know people have been down with their results and others have been happy I am in the middle as I am still new to this and trying to learn from the diesel guru and the forum about cars. From what I can understand there are a variety of hidden extras that play on the results. The reason I am in the middle is due to the fact that although every engine is different I have a pretty good comparison with Ed's graph and if you look at the graph lines rather than the numbers on the side they are where the focus is on how long power is sustained and where it peaks etc.
(wow my first informative post, I hope my info is correct, help me out please guru)
Mine is interesting compared to Ed's as my car is completely standard so we can compare our cars a little.
(Looking at Eds of shoot 4 and shoot 4f) I think if I remember correctly the man said that it was hard to find a category to place diesels in as they are a bit of a grey area. What was shocking was the amount of categories there were rather than just a couple which I would have thought he brought the list up and the results vary from each one.
I know people have been down with their results and others have been happy I am in the middle as I am still new to this and trying to learn from the diesel guru and the forum about cars. From what I can understand there are a variety of hidden extras that play on the results. The reason I am in the middle is due to the fact that although every engine is different I have a pretty good comparison with Ed's graph and if you look at the graph lines rather than the numbers on the side they are where the focus is on how long power is sustained and where it peaks etc.
(wow my first informative post, I hope my info is correct, help me out please guru)
Easy tiger.