On Monday I took a trip to John Middleton who flow tested a standard head and the head that Dale ported for me. Pleased to say dale increased the intake flow by 6.5% and improved the exhaust by 10%! Bringing the exhaust to intake ratio to 73.3%, up from around 66% match on the standard head. Very pleased.
I am going to draw some graphs up to show the gains.
Cheers dale
Did you ever make those graphs Paul?
Out of interest i've just been comparing the headflow of the GA vs the SR20DE highport head. The GA head isnt as bad as i had first thought, particulary the intake side.
Stock DE Highport Head flows:
INTAKE: 208 cfm @ 28" Mercury OR 124 cfm @ 10" water
EXHAUST: 148 cfm @ 28" Mercury OR 88cfm @ 10" water
@ 0.400" LIFT
Stock GA Head flows:
INTAKE: 167 cfm tested @ 28" Mercury OR 100 cfm @ 10" Water
EXHAUST:116 cfm tested @ 28 Mercury OR of 70 cfm @ 10" water
Measured @ 0.350" LIFT
Paul's GA head flows:
INTAKE: 177cfm @ 28" Mercury OR 108 cfm @ 10" water
EXHAUST: 128cfm@ 28" Mercury OR 77cfm @ 10" water
Measured @ 0.350" Lift
.......
Citroen Saxo 1.6 VTS (16v) 120bhp
INTAKE: 173 cfm @ 28" Mercury OR 104 cfm @ 10" water
EXHAUST: 140cfm @ 28" Mercury OR 84 cfm @ 10" water
^ Regarding power potential of your motor Paul, i believe the 1.6 VTS engines are attaining 150bhp fairly easily with intake/exhaust and cams, and the headflow is similar, the GA is down a bit on the exhaust still, but the extra compression will help compensate for that.