what header you using dale?
what header you using dale?
Personally I think it would be foolish to use a thicker head gasket just to allow for piston / valve clearance.
Do the job properly...have the pistons notched, or install a set of notched pistons, while still keeping the compression high.
I would want 12:1 compression AT A MINIMUM!!!
You forgot the headgasket
Personally I think it would be foolish to use a thicker head gasket just to allow for piston / valve clearance.
Do the job properly...have the pistons notched, or install a set of notched pistons, while still keeping the compression high.
I would want 12:1 compression AT A MINIMUM!!!
I disagree now....
11:1 is a happy medium where aggressive ignition timing is still possible, with the compression too high, you have to be conservative. Been told every 3* of ignition timing could cost you 10hp..
I'm GLAD mine's under the 12:1 mark after all the issues Craig's had with higher comp...
Dale if you're stuck because of valve-piston contact, and you can't resolve it, keep in mind what I said about a trade for the C2's (there would be cash your way obviously).
Joe
Thing is bud, I wouldn't be building an engine like that without using a high octane fuel anyways, so ignition timing wouldn't even cross my mind.
I could see why this would be an issue thogh on a daily driven car as fuel costs would be horrendous!
But look at it this way...will you make more power with altering compression or igntion timing?
the overlap on his cams means he wont be running 11:1 compression though... a lot of the mixture will be lost while both sets of valves are open... lowering the comp ratio... so on paper it coule be 11:1 but in practice when its running it could be a lot lower, meaning you can fire the ignition forward...
the way i see it... high comp pistons are only a supporting mod for lairy cams... to keep dynamic compression up...
the way i see it... high comp pistons are only a supporting mod for lairy cams... to keep dynamic compression up...